Monday, May 25, 2026

Comparison of Small Bottles from the 1908 Great White Fleet Visit to Amoy, China

 A 1908 Great White Fleet crossed flags Chinese cloisonne bottle currently on offer at eBay sent me on a search through the picture files I’ve accumulated to compare the various different styles used to decorate these pieces.

Zhou Chunbing, in his 2022 book 珐琅局 : 中国近代景泰蓝名作坊研究与收藏 (Enamel Bureau: Research and Collection of Famous Cloisonné Workshops in Modern China), describes how the Lao Tianli factory, established 1901, in its 1912 advertising promoted its production of these pieces. [full quote at end of slides]

The style of the dragons seems consistent with Lao Tianli iconography.https://www.beadiste.com/2013/10/puzzling-evidence-lao-tian-lis-dragon.html 

Extensive information and memorabilia of the fleet’s visit to Amoy, China can be found at this link:

 https://greatwhitefleet.us/home/world_cruise/amoy_china/ 

The 1900 Boxer Rebellion left Chinese cloisonne workshops in economic peril thanks to destruction and looting on the part of all parties in the conflict. Decheng, a factory that catered to foreigners, was evidently devastated, its owner deceased. It was continued under the name of its auxiliary factory, Dexingcheng. But in the meantime, it seems likely that many skilled cloisonne artists were seeking re-employment; therefore, a large order from the Imperial government that had to be executed quickly possibly sent many of them to work for Laotianli.  Hence the interest in considering how the various artists approached the composition of the designs.

The comparisons give rise to a secondary question about whether these 1908 pieces were replicated in later years, perhaps with different artists contracted under the Laotianli workshop network, or even later still?

[Click on slides for larger image, then open image in new tab for even larger.]




































































Saturday, May 23, 2026

Article on Chinese Cloisonne Manufacture in March 6, 1920 Issue of Scientific American

 Quaint but informative, useful evidence for the style of some of the shapes the coppersmiths were producing.

As to these coppersmiths, Juliet Bredon, in her 1922 guide to Peking, recounts the fate of the monks at one of the temples (last slide).

The last paragraph in the Scientific American article, however, is 100% wrong.



Wednesday, May 20, 2026

Mysterious Business Card for the TianXinCheng 天新成 (成新天 Tien Hsin Cheng) Cloisonne Company

 A puzzle partly resolved by a passage in Zhou Chunbing's 2022 book, Enamel Bureau: Research and Collection of Famous Cloisonné Workshops in Modern China.

A business card with a factory name similar to DeXingCheng, perhaps emphasizing a new, modern look to appeal to chic shoppers in the 1920s?  An imitator, or a branch manager? Or perhaps a factory operating post-World War II?

Zhou found a 1947 reference with this exact workshop name, including the owner, so evidently it was operating post-WWII.  Whether it was operating before WWII, or whether it survived or was reorganized to be one of the 42 factories incorporated into the Beijing Enamel Factory in 1956 is unclear to me (Zhou, pages 33-34). The workshop existed in 1947, but its predecessor and/or successor, if any, are a mystery. And of course there are no signed pieces to attribute to this workshop, so we don't know the style of their pieces.  

Of note, perhaps, is that the address listed for TianXinCheng in the 1947 survey is 52 Chongwenmen Inner Street.  The 1935 DeXingCheng flyer lists the shop address as "52 Hatamen Street."  In 1949 Hatamen Street was re-named Chongwenmen Inner Street. The business card appears to list both forms of the address, one in English in the main body, the other in Chinese on the card's left sidebar. Is the shop perhaps the last incarnation of DeXingCheng, the name reflecting a "new" revival?  Or is it one of the many mixed-name shops cited in a 1928 survey (see slide with quote from Zhou below). How to account for the street number discrepancy between the card  (64) and the 1947 survey listing  (52)?  Puzzling evidence...

"According to a survey conducted in March 1947, there were approximately thirty cloisonné enamelware factories and over forty shops selling cloisonné enamelware in Beiping (Beijing). There were also about ten self-producing and self-selling businesses, mostly concentrated in the Chongwenmen Street, Wangfujing Street, and Qianmenwai Street areas. Their scale was evident from the number of employees. The Japanese invasion of China in 1937 disrupted sea routes, and several well-known workshops disappeared for various reasons, leaving only a few small, family-run workshops that remained, some disappearing and some reappearing, until the early days of the People's Republic of China. Clearly, large workshops that insisted on high-quality materials, exquisite craftsmanship, and superior workmanship could no longer survive and all ceased operations. ...

On August 31, 1949, the Beiping Municipal Government's Bureau of Industry and Commerce invited experts and professors including Liang Sicheng, Fei Xiaotong, Xu Beihong, Lin Huiyin, Gao Zhuang, Ma Datao, Wu Zuoren, Ma Heng, Han Shoushou, and Wang Shixiang, as well as over 30 representatives from the Beiping Special Handicrafts Association, importers and exporters, women's federations, banks, and industrial research institutes to a symposium. On the spot, nine people, including Liang Sicheng, Fei Xiaotong, and Xu Beihong, were elected to establish a research institution on special handicrafts. Under the leadership of Professors Liang Sicheng and Lin Huiyin, the Department of Architecture at Tsinghua University established an art group to rescue the endangered art of cloisonné. It is evident that it was precisely through the rescue and protection efforts of the People's Government and the guidance and assistance of experts that Beijing cloisonné was restored and developed.

In 1956, private enamel workshops were merged into the Beijing Enamel Factory (including investors and absorbed businesses)."

[click on pictures to enlarge them]



Tuesday, May 19, 2026

Mysterious Japanese Cloisonne Scroll Weghts (Fuchin)

Recently I acquired a large  45x33mm bead designed as a Japanese scroll weight (fuchin).  The design and rounded shape resembles a spherical bead also in my little collection of three. None of them were very expensive (although the crocheted and knotted tassels seem harder to come by), possibly because they look so  … “rugged,” shall we say.

Two possibilities:

1.       They’re early mid-19th century cloisonne, made before the early pre-Meiji workshops got the glass formulations and wire solder right, hence the gassy, pitted enamel that can’t be brought to a high polish (doro shippo); or,

2.       They’re much later products, possibly circa 1920s, deliberately designed to be crude according to the wabi-sabi aesthetic.

What do you think?

[Note: clicking on a photo will enlarge it, and the image can then be enlarged a bit further by opening it in a new tab.]

My small collection





Comparison of 4 different cylinders

Six more cylinders





Thursday, May 14, 2026

Rare Antique Chinese Cloisonne Beads Featuring Spotted Deer, Red-Crowned Cranes, and a Dragon

 Eleven years ago, back in July 2015, I wrote about 4 rare Chinese cloisonne beads featuring red-crowned cranes.  Recently two similar beads turned up, this time featuring a dragon chasing the flaming pearl of wisdom, and a landscape scene with a tiny spotted deer and red-crowned crane among mountainside pines. These are classic Chinese themes.  The following slides from auctions at Christie’s and Sotheby’s and the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art provide explanation and examples.

If anyone has other examples of these seemingly very rare antique beads, do let me know.

[Clicking on an image will enlarge it; opening the enlarged image in a new tab will enlarge it even more.]